" A super cool template for bloggers, photographers and travelers "

Bring a Loupe: Completely Fake Patek Philippe 1463 In Steel On eBay For Over $25,000 – Here’s How To Tell It’s A Fake

When It Is Too Good To Be True…

Finding an astonishing watch for a deal resembles searching for water in the desert: there two or three desert springs however what you for the most part see are hallucinations. Great purchases positively exist, as we called attention to numerous in Bring A Loupe over the previous years. Right in the course of recent weeks I saw TWO Universal Genève Big Eye being snapped on eBay for under $2,500 each (equitable to give a new example).

However, you ought to always expect that there is a valid justification behind a value that appears to be excessively pleasant: the watch has likely something profoundly wrong about it. This straight-out neurosis may appear to be extraordinary however this attitude will allow you to evade numerous exorbitant slip-ups and, some uncommon occasions, to find the one genuine gem.

Before we plunge into the numerous flaws of this fake Patek reference 1463, how about we give A for Ambition to the creator of that chronograph. I mean he didn’t restrict himself to the typical Submariner, no he went straight for the waterproof 1463 in STEEL, a vessel of numerous collectors.

Why Is The Reference 1463 In Steel A Big Deal?

A right Patek reference 1463 – Image from the Talking Watches with Alfredo Paramico

The chronograph reference 1463 possesses an extraordinary spot in Patek’s set of experiences: it was the absolute first waterproof chronograph they at any point created, back in 1940. Over the 25 years of the creation time frame just 750 examples were at any point produced, a simple 30 watches every year! Of those 750 just a small bunch had a tempered steel case as Ben depicted here . The specific number is at this point unclear yet like any steel Patek of that period it just addresses a little part of the absolute creation, yellow gold being way more famous at the time.

That said the number must be higher than 10, the figure chosen by the eBay dealer. For sure, effectively 17 steel 1463 are portrayed in incredible length in John Goldberger ‘s Patek Philippe Steel Watches and numerous others showed up in sell-offs around the planet. On a sidenote, 1463 with rose gold cases like the one we highlighted here are significantly more extraordinary than treated steel examples.

I will now bring up the most striking highlights of the magnificent fake that we chose to examine.

What Is Wrong, Doctor?

To evaluate a watch’s realness I recommend dismantling each and every component and cautiously compare it to a similar part from a watch you know to be certified. Numerous sources exist yet I unquestionably encourage to go past a quick Google Images search, a few fakes are shockingly well-positioned. I as a rule favor the reference books regarding that matter – here I allude to Patek Philippe Steel Watches book just as Christie’s closeout inventories – however in the event that your library is pitiful there are some phenomenal material on the web, remarkably on committed discussions or on HODINKEE, out of all websites.

The Crown And Pushers, Obviously Wrong

The crown and pushers just don’t match!

The right crown and pushers for the reference 1463

Here we have the most clear sign that the eBay posting is off-putting, the crown and pushers don’t match the style of the reference 1463 by any means! The crown ought to have an alternate profile as the subsequent image shows, a greater “knock” (for absence of better word). The chronograph pushers are genuinely parting with the trick: the round siphon pushers ought to have the characteristic sunburst etching common to many waterproof cases made by the provider Francois Borgel – you can likewise locate those on some Movado M95 from a similar case-maker.

Furthermore, The Hands Are Not Better

Some rough hands here

The right hands for the reference 1463

When you take a gander at the hands it gets too simple, not a solitary one is right! The blued focal second hand doesn’t have the right shape at all and the equivalent applies to two hands in the sub-registers, they are too fat and both ought not be blued. Also, to make an already difficult situation even worse, the hands are a horrendous blue shade, and are unquestionably not blue prepared and are perhaps paint. To finish up on this simple comparison the shape and length of the moment and hour hands don’t work better. Looking at the length of the hands is always a decent check, here the moment hand ought to in no way, shape or form reach out over the course of the moment track.

The Engravings On The Case Back Are Slightly Off

Finding the slip-ups working on this issue back required a more moment assessment yet comparing to different examples in the Stainless Steel book uncovered the phony by and by. Two or three central issues: the cross below the patent line ought to be more extensive and the equivalent goes for the Ref. etching. The text style isn’t right as well, this becomes obvious when comparing the numbers 2, 3, and 5 particularly yet this investigation may become excessively definite here. So, this case back is a preferable phony over some different parts however it is still evidently wrong.

A Dial With Small Mismatches

From VERY far, the dial may have looked alright – on the off chance that you don’t consider all the warning signs depicted previously. Again numerous things set our alert, beginning with the files that don’t have refinement of Patek’s creation. At that point given the chronic number shown looking into the issue back, the dial ought to rather highlight the long signature so Patek Philippe & Co. instead of basically Patek Philippe: in fact the 732758 reference number signifies a 1945 creation before Patek changed to a short signature on the dial in 1948.

Now comes the most delightful finding: the reference number was really taken from a legitimate 1463 sold in 2003 as shown here ! What’s more, the equivalent goes for the development number 863639 additionally coming from this ‘giver’ watch envisioned below.

The REAL Patek 1463

To wrap things up The Case and Buckle Are Not Okay Either

At this stage, there is no anticipation left except for it ought to be underlined that the case isn’t right – it ought to remarkably highlight bored hauls and the clasp is an offense to Wenger, the typical provider of clasps for Patek Philippe around that time.

Also, The Verdict Is

Guilty, past any sensible uncertainty! When you can set up with total sureness that the case, dial, hands, crown, pushers, clasp are phony there isn’t much left to defend.

The last guideline I wanted to make reference to in shutting was to always purchase the merchant as much as the watch. This suggests posing explaining inquiries before any exchange and getting references from the dealer. On account of a posting on eBay taking a gander at the evaluations and history of the dealer can be helpful, albeit here the outcomes were not that alarming.

I trust this article will persuade you to in no way, shape or form offer on this “exceptionally uncommon” Patek 1463 and, ideally, lead you to more secure purchases later on. We’ve reached eBay to alarm them this is phony, yet the watch stays a functioning posting here .