Interview: A Collector's Discussion With Roger Smith

Interview: A Collector's Discussion With Roger Smith

Smith had accomplished rebuilding work for a vendor in London, and this seller had a client searching for a bespoke pocket watch. The client caught wind of Smith and chose to give Smith his first commission. This pocket watch, Smith’s third, was thusly his first sale.

So your third pocket watch had a 15-second remontoir , Peto cross detent escapement , and an up/down mechanism. What is the Peto cross detent escapement?

You can see it in Chamberlain’s book It’s About Time. It is, in the event that you like, a “perfectionist’s detent escapement” because the idealist would say that as the exemplary spring (which customarily sits on the detent) flicks back, it might actually destabilize the detent. So you have the exemplary spring on the contrary side of the detent. The detent at that point comes into the middle; the exemplary spring comes into the middle, and it accomplishes all the work, but doesn’t impact the detent. So it’s a genuine idealist’s escapement.

And it’s described as having an up/down mechanism… do you mean a power hold pointer?


You considered utilizing Daniels’ book Watchmaking, and there are numerous releases, so did the later versions develop because of Daniels and you working together?

No. No association. I think he just refreshed it with a few additional photos and that is all truly. He likewise put the Millennium wristwatch in there, which we were making.

The Millennium arrangement was made utilizing the primary Omega developments off the creation line. Along these lines, what did you folks do to them?

We made the cases, dials , hands , and the automatic rotor… and the schedule mechanism. George planned a schedule work for it, because it had the [date] window at 3 o’clock, so he planned an exceptionally basic but extremely cunning little framework to work the hand.

So [the date] changed from a window to a hand?

Yes, I mean it was brilliant truly. So straightforward! No one but George could come up with a thought that way. We wound up completing the developments, icing it, putting some shape, in a real sense just with a record, into a portion of the plates. The watch was truly made to celebrate George’s astounding achievement; that he had figured out how to get this escapement industrialized.

You were engaged with making two unique wristwatches called “Blue” and “White” that are rectangular-cased tourbillon wristwatches fitted with the Daniels Co-pivotal escapement and a schedule complication, planned by Dr. George Daniels and marked Daniels London. Are these Daniels watches or yours? Or on the other hand did you help him make them as his apprentice?

Well I think George got these orders a half year or a year before I was because of leave him. I figure he did it to help me as I would prefer truly. He found the customers, he planned the watch, and it encouraged me in transit as I was beginning my Series 1. It just mellowed the blow [of transitioning] to working all alone again.

Your Series 1 was a progression of twelve rectangular watches, right? Would you be able to discuss that watch? What was the development, etc.?

We just at any point made nine eventually. Around then I had exceptionally restricted equipment. I was all the while utilizing George’s workshop for the dance boring, etc. I bought in a train of wheels, escapement, balance wheel, and hand set mechanism. And afterward I built the plates, planned the retrograde schedule mechanism, and made the dials, hands, case, and made a watch around those components. Basically it was a way in for me, because I didn’t have the skill at that point to make a full watch, nor the equipment.

I was battling with the choice – do I simply buy a development, put my name on it and sell it? Numerous individuals said I should simply do that. But I was wrestling with that, and I wasn’t actually content with that thought. So this was, as far as I might be concerned, a pleasant passage point.

For your Series 1, I read that there should be three pieces made for the Onely Collection [in collaboration with originator Theo Fennell]. Were those the three that weren’t made?

No, they were made.

Okay, so of the nine, three were for the Onely Collection, and six were “normal.”

So, taking a gander at the course of events from your website, in 2006 it specifies you completed Unique Commission #3, a tourbillon wristwatch. Is this called #3 because Blue and White were #1 and #2?

No, I got a few orders from the get-go. I got requests to make three tourbillons. In those early days I was growing the business without much forethought, attempting to keep cash coming in. I got three orders. The initially was a grande date, which is [Unique Commission] #1.

It says 2009 on [the timetable for] that one.

Yes, it took a long effort to complete, because I was battling with the mechanism.

Number 3 was a less difficult one and that wound up being created first. Furthermore, number 2 I will be completing in about two weeks time. There were issues with the technical determinations that the customer wanted, which we have debated for a number of years. There’s additionally a 4th commission [produced in 2010].

So you’ve just delivered four bespokes?


In 2004, you launched Series 2. Which escapement do they use?

They’re all co-axial.

The development of the Series 2

Did you switch from the “Daniels Co-pivotal” to your improved “Smith Co-axial”?

The Millenniums were the slimline variant. So I had insight with that escapement, and I felt that George’s unique (the customary pinion with two co-hub wheels) was better. So I went with that variant for the Series 2. But I’ve now advanced that escapement so now we have a single wheel thus on.

I began utilizing only a customary Daniels Co-hub. So it’s a little conventional pinion and afterward two co-pivotal wheels, but they were independent by then. Furthermore, they went into the main Series 2. Furthermore, I think I created the single wheel in about 2010.

So all the ones from 2010 onwards were single wheel?


And even today? On the off chance that somebody requested one today, that would be a single wheel?


Throughout the film [“The Watchmaker’s Apprentice”], it makes reference to that Daniels dominated 32 of the 34 exchanges included watchmaking – so which two were missing?

Balance spring making and engraving.

Do you as of now do every one of the 32 exchanges your watchmaking?

Yes, we do really, yes! We seldom need to make jewels. We buy stock jewels, etc. But, for example, this tourbillon that I’m simply working on, I needed to utilize an uncommon jewel for that.

So you ordinarily buy jewels, fountainhead, balance spring, sapphires, and lashes. But that is it?


Do you make a portion of the screws?

We do need to put forth defense screws and things like that. A portion of the odd-scaled ones.

How a large number of those 32 would you say that you’ve mastered?

Gosh, you know we do a generally excellent job now. We are profoundly proficient in what we do. I’m extremely pleased that we’re running an outrageously close workshop. A long time back, we all had our own range of abilities, and we’d pass one watch starting with one watchmaker then onto the next. The watches were incredibly, acceptable, but I knew that there was opportunity to get better. So about three years prior I began a serious preparing, teaching everybody how to make dials, hands, cases and any remaining parts of the development that they weren’t doing. So now everybody is accomplishing brilliant work, they truly are. Phenomenal work.

So basically there with all 32?

Yes, without a doubt.

That’s excellent!

Again, in the film it’s referenced that Daniels believed that you ought not see the hand of the creator in a watch? Is that exact, did he truly believe that?

Yes, without a doubt.

Do you have the equivalent philosophy?

Yes. But then you can take a gander at the etching. The etching of the mechanisms is everything hand done, and each dial is completely unique because of that. So each watch actually recounts its story. You can in any case see the handwork. The beveling will be diverse on each and every watch. Now and again it will be more profound on some than others, etc. It varies.

You produce watches without the utilization of dreary or automatic devices, is that correct?

We use CNC, which I suppose is automatic.

So it’s basically CNC in addition to hand worked machines and tools.


What would you describe as your particular tasteful components? One that stands apart are your scalloped arrow hands, which are beautiful. Would you say that you have other ones?

I guess actually the hands are the key component. The English-completed developments anybody could do and it would be incredible on the off chance that they did.

Series 2 watch with the mark scalloped hands

About the 35th Anniversary Daniels watch. To get down to it, you basically made the 35th Anniversary watch completely yourself. You planned it, obviously based off his tasteful. But you planned it and built it all.

Yes, George was there to take a gander at plans and advise me in the event that it was correct or wrong, so it’s particularly a Daniels. By then I’d known George for quite a long while so it was becoming natural anyway. What I battled with was when I needed to make my next watch, I fail to remember which it was, I battled a bit to return to my own plans because I had become “Daniels-ified.” It was quite an interesting period really.

So your creation of ten watches each year is at present, and for some time now has been, a blend of yours (Series 2) and 35th Anniversary pieces?


So obviously at one point, Daniels arrived at where his hands weren’t sufficiently consistent to make watches any longer. Was that around the Blue and White time?

It was not long before at that point. When I was building the Millenniums with him, I was all alone for the most recent 18 months, just about two years. By then he was in his mid-70s.

Is the co-hub actually protected, or has the patent run out?

Yes, it has run out. It ran out before Omega got intrigued actually.

Why don’t more individuals use it at that point? Do you know who utilizes it?

Myself and Omega.

That’s it?

I think it is because it’s hard to make, and all the more critically it’s down to promoting.

Can you envision the present circumstance if Rolex said “OK, we will move over to the co-pivotal.” Suddenly it would resemble saying, “Omega is better than us.” It’s never going to occur. It’s a disgrace because actually it’s smothering horology. It’s smothering progression.

It’s a disgrace because truly it’s smothering horology. It’s smothering progression.

– – Roger Smith on the absence of widespread selection of the coaxial escapement.

Do you feel like if a little producer, a comparative watchmaker to you making say 10 pieces every year, said “You know, that is a better escapement. I will begin utilizing it” you would be fine with that?

Great, yes. Regardless, I can’t stop them!

But would you feel like it would resemble ripping off your scalloped hands or something?

No, not under any condition. It’s there to be utilized by everybody. It would be brilliant, in fact!

You discussed a portion of your upgrades to the co-pivotal. Would you like to really expound because there was a progression of them essentially?

There were a few unique sorts. In 2010 there was the single wheel.

Which combined the two wheels into one piece with two levels.

That’s correct. It had an incredible benefit because out of nowhere you’re eliminating all the mistakes that you’ll get by having two wheels pushed onto a similar arbor and attempting to arrange them appropriately. Furthermore, it improved execution quite drastically.

Single Wheel Coaxial Escapement

Then the light one came… the current one.

That was 2012? The second era with a lighter design?

I was simply again attempting to improve it, to improve execution. A sensational reaction. What’s more, we were able to drop the heart, which is acceptable – it draws out the existence of the mechanism. It removes the wear.

Smith’s lightweight rendition of the single-wheel coaxial escapement

By “drop the heart,” you mean?

In terms of power. You can utilize a weaker heart. Less wear on the mechanism. Simply better all around.

How did you make it lighter? Was it decreasing material? Changing metal?

The initial one had two edges. Also, what I did on the second was to make extremely long teeth for the external teeth and it worked well indeed.

The GREAT Britain watch is a unique piece. Has it been sold?


Will it be available to be purchased at some point?

I don’t know really. It was an honor to make The GREAT Britain and at the present time, it is venturing to the far corners of the planet addressing the best of British inventiveness and development. Additionally, I don’t really have a watch and indeed I never have a piece to show individuals, so I figure I would get a kick out of the chance to hold it!

Movement-wise, is it basically equivalent to your Series 2?

Yes. Deprived of the up/down mechanism.

Ballpark what number Series 2 pieces have you made?

Maybe about 60 pieces over a long term period – or right around 10 years.

On what’s to come…

Do you want to speak at all about future watches coming out? What mystery would you like to give us?

I have another advancement of the co-pivotal far beyond what we as of now have. So I’m updating the arrangement 2 around the new co-hub and bringing out a little arrangement of pieces. I consider it to be a bit of a rebirth truly. That is its possibility. New escapement, new development. I’ve taken in quite significantly in the course of recent years. My thoughts of developments have changed and how to plan them. But what has not changed is my commitment to creating similar number of pieces. Keeping to 10 pieces a year.

Almost everybody wants to have an inheritance. Would you say that you trust one of your inheritances, other than your extraordinary watches, would be to establish the Isle of Man as a focal point of watchmaking excellence?

It’s extraordinary to be able to carry on George’s work. What I’m likewise quick to do is to show that watches can be made again in Britain. There’s this thought that it has passed on and disappeared, but from my first watch, the Series 1, the thought behind that was simply to say we actually can make watches in Britain.

How numerous individuals right now work in your workshop, and what do they do?

There are eight of us. One is Caroline, my wife, who does records and messages and keeps me on an honest way of living. We have another person, an engineer, who utilizes the CNC to supply the watchmakers with a decent extent of the parts. Also, the rest is comprised of watchmakers and we are on the whole responsible for building watches.

I’d prefer to express gratitude toward Roger Smith especially for setting aside the effort to talk with me. It was an entirely enjoyable chat and I trust you appreciated perusing it!